The second ALUIAR meeting will be held at 09.30 on July 11th and the Agenda is fairly brief.
- Review of work to date
- Transcriptions – Conventions – Mary Gobbi
- Storyboarding new ideas for Synote
- Next Meeting.
So far the results from the System Usability Scale (SUS) – “the ten-item attitude Likert scale giving a global view of subjective assessments of usability” (wikipedia) have given Synote a score of 50 where 100 is best. The interviewees have also provided scores for the usability of several of the web pages that make up the service. Score were 1 for hard to use/ awful and 6 for easy to use / excellent – the average was 2.5 in terms of usability but many commented on the clean looking design. There is a clear need to improve the usability for researchers and the learnability.
The challenge is to solve the issues around comments such as these…
“Definitely not learnable!” every time you go to it you have to think about it all over again – you have to work out where you are going all over again!”
“It looks nice but not very helpful… I still do not know what I am meant to be searching…. Or what do I do with the advanced search…. Why search when I need to create a recording?”
“Goes to Show recording and it does not click – but I can replay and I have not even seen it for the first time?”
” There seems to be some unnecessary jargon – don’t know what private, read write, tags? Language – what is an XML file? Automatic transcription? Raised expectations – press converter and magically it will do it all with no work?”
“What does the ID mean? – this does not actually describe what the recording is about – just says a name… you do not know what it is – but we are not looking for any of this as we want to create a recording.”
“Some of it is there… but you do know you have three steps and these should be clearly visible as per the Olympics – or booking a airline ticket on line”.